Should Dorseyland have nukes?

I’ve been handling nuclear materials since I was a teenager, so I can at least marginally empathise with the Iranians – that it’s “neat” (my word, not President Ahmadinejad’s). What I was doing in possession of radium and uranium is another question entirely.
I bought them in a kit, just like millions of other kids. I think it was a chemistry set in general, but it had a strip of cardboard coated with radium and not a lick of advice about radioactive contamination.
And I still have the spinthariscope, a plastic eyepiece in which you can watch the atomic disintegration of a tiny chunk of uranium encased inside. Inside the plastic, not lead. Through a plastic lens.
The one pictured above is a little something like it, but mine has wonderful sweeping curves out to the eye area.
You sit with the spinthariscope in a dark room (I spent hours in the cubby-hole of my childhood house) until your pupils dilate enough that you can see the sparks flying off the isotope. They make terrific little streaks not unlike shooting stars.

This was “really neat” when I was about 14. Now that I’m 53 the effect is “superb”, and the fact that the authorities allowed me to have this “toy” and my parents allowed me to spend so much time in the dark with it is, mmmm, let’s call it “gratifyingly twisted”.
My own children, their pupils permanently dilated by video games, don’t show the slightest interest.

You can still readily buy spinthariscopes, though the vendors today fall all over themselves reassuring customers that they’re completely safe, thus taking much of the fun out of it. Back in the ’60s when I got mine, and especially in the ’50s when selling them to kids was completely outer limits, nuclear power was still edgy stuff. I remember the October Crisis of ‘62 very well, and the school next to mine hosted the town’s massive air-raid siren, which was tested fairly often. I think we were supposed to go to the basement, if at home, and under the desk if at school, though I never got those great “duck and cover” lessons that American children thrilled to. I didn’t know anyone who had a bomb shelter, but there were a lot of them in Canada too.

Anyway, I dug a hole in the Internet hoping to mine some uranium-for-kids facts, and discovered that the AC Gilbert Co of New Haven, Connecticut, “experimented” (as it were) with atomising youth for about one year, 1950-51.
The firm had had such success with its famous Erector sets and chemistry sets that it decided to go fission (ha ha!) with the Gilbert Atomic Energy Lab. It claims it was “unofficially encouraged by the government, who thought that our set would aid in public understanding of atomic energy and stress its constructive side. We had the great help of some of the country’s best nuclear physicists and worked closely with MIT in it’s development.”
This is nothing like the kit I managed to get my hands on years later, because mine had no Geiger counter or “cloud chamber where atoms could be split”. I’d have remembered that.
The toymakers sold this outfit for a massive $50, and unloaded quite a few, but even then couldn’t recoup their production costs. That’s when certain components of the atomic set were integrated into Gilbert’s chemistry sets, and that’s probably how I went nuclear.

Before he started making glow-in-the-dark children, AC Gilbert fostered a generation of engineers by inventing the Erector Set. Before that he pole-vaulted to a gold medal in the 1908 London Olympics – he’s the guy who came up with that little box in the ground that vaulters stick their poles into on take-off.
Chances are he became expert at the pole-vault while big-game hunting in Africa, another of his passions, although he could just as easily have vanished into thin air if pursued by a rhino because he was also an gifted magician.
Yale made Gilbert a physician, not a magician, but he preferred the wizardry stuff and opted to make magic sets rather than set bones. His Mysto Manufacturing Co eventually became AC Gilbert Co, which introduced the Erector set at the 1913 Toy Fair in New York City and then sold 30 million of them over the next 50 years.
Gilbert died in 1961, but I couldn’t find out the cause. With all his accomplishments it makes you wonder. Today there’s an AC Gilbert Heritage Society, founded by Erector-set nuts who enjoy poring over his 1954 autobiography, “The Man Who Lives in Paradise”.

The New York Toy Fair was also where Gilbert unveiled the Atomic Energy Lab, creating quite a stir. It was the most thoroughly scientific toy ever produced, and as such was over the heads of most kids. There was no way to market a “beginner’s atomic energy lab”. So it went bust, three of its parts transmuted into a chemistry kit with wider appeal.

The spinthariscope resulted from clumsiness, as is often unnervingly the case in atomic science. In 1903 Sir William Crookes, the guilty-looking fellow on the left, was puttering around with radium bromide, the most expensive material on the planet at the time. Working in total darkness for some reason, he spilled a scoop on a sheet of zinc sulfide, then used a magnifying lens to make sure he found every costly speck.
Sparks were flying. Crookes wanted to know if he was going crazy and investigated, and discovered that the flashes of light were photons. Individual alpha particles whizzing off the radium were smacking into the zinc sulfide and atoms were splitting in panic or joy, depending on how you look at it. Crookes had not only discovered the basics for the spinthariscope but the first radiation detector, well before Mr Geiger came a-counting.
Crookes and Julius Elster and Hans Geitel worked out the design and marketing plan for the spinthariscope (the name comes from the Greek word for scintillation), and before they could say “nuclear proliferation”, it was making the rounds at fun-filled “academic parties”.

The company that sells the United Nuclear Spinthariscope tells me that its “toy” not only contains no risky/expensive radium, it may not be uranium in my version either. It uses high-grade thorium ore mined at Alberta’s Great Bear Lake, “the only naturally occurring radioactive material that will put on the dazzling nuclear display”. (Wikipedia says it’s americanum, the same stuff found in smoke-detectors, but who’s to quibble?)
“As the source material undergoes natural radioactive decay, atoms of it continuously explode, releasing alpha particles travelling at 20,000 miles per hour. Although alpha particles can only travel a little over an inch in the air and can’t even penetrate a sheet of paper, when they hit the zinc sulfide, photons are released, the basic components of light. “This produces the thousands of tiny flashes (scintillations) of blue-white light you see through the magnifying lens. Alpha radiation is just common helium atoms that have lost their electrons, travelling at very high speed.”
This firm’s spinthariscope has an adjustable focus, a modern improvement that makes me wonder even more about my eyesight, quite apart from radioactive bombardment of my cerebral cortex.
“It will continue to operate producing tiny visible nuclear explosions for at least 60 years,” the manufacturer says. But hey, I was a junior physicist – I was never worried about lapsing shelf-life leaving me with a dud fission-viewer. Glow on, my little genie in the lamp, glow on.

10 Comments »

Right-click here for TrackBack URI

  1. Comment by Mike, June 23, 2006 @ 4:55 am

    Where can I buy a spinthariscope for under $30?

  2. Comment by dorseyland, June 23, 2006 @ 4:22 pm

    You guessed right that mine isn’t for sale for ANY amount, Mike (or is it?), but a quick Google search will have you rolling in offers, though I can’t guarantee a price that low, but maybe eBay — I saw at least one there too.

  3. Comment by Mike, July 20, 2006 @ 5:15 am

    United Nuclear has spinthariscopes for $30 plus about 9 bucks shipping.

  4. Comment by dorseyland, July 20, 2006 @ 8:27 am

    Okay, but don’t forget you need a cerebellum protection shield too.

  5. Comment by Tim May, August 5, 2006 @ 5:02 am

    I discovered that alpha particles cause “soft errors” (one time single bit flips) in RAMs (Random-access memories, aka DRAMs and SRAMs) partly because I had a Gilbert Chemistry Set with a spinthariscope in it, circa 1962.

    This spinthariscope was part of my conversion to physics, which I started studying in junior high school, a few years after the spinthariscope adventures. I joined Intel Corporation, then a small company, in 1974.

    The story is long, and can be Googled, but the gist is that in 1976 several of our devices were showing occasional random, single-bit errors (bit flips). Ones were becoming zeroes, or vice versa, depending on the logical circuitry.

    A lot of effort was put into this, as memories were then Intel’s main business (the 8080A was only two years old then).

    Various theories of the cause of the errors were disproved. One night, in early 1977, I was sitting in the outdoor hot tub in my apartment complex, thinking about what could be causing these mysterious errors.

    I noticed the ceramic tile walls of the hot tub and thought of the ceramic packages our devices were in, and the ceramic or rock or claylike walls of places where background radiation is known to be a problem (granite walls of subways, etc.). I thought of dating pottery by counting the fossil alpha tracks in mica flecks. I thought of Monazite sands, the zirconia of our glasses and ceramics, and low level radiation.

    And I thought of the little flashes of light in my 1962 Gilbert spinthariscope and what such flashes would mean if morphed into silicon (by morphed I mean that ZnS is not Si, so the mechanisms are shifted, but similar).

    The next day, I confirmed low levels of radioactivity in our packages. (Because of the glasses and ceramics used.)

    Within a few months, the physics was known. We kept it a deep secret for over a year, until low-alpha materials could be lined up, ahead of our competitors (Mostek, National, Texas Instruments, Fairchilld, Signetics….).

    Eventually, I was allowed to give a public paper on this. This paper won the first Best Paper award at the conference it was given at, and was selected a year later as the IEEE’s paper of the year.

    I retired in 1986 as a wealthy man, for this and other discoveries.

    All from, at least partly, a lowly Gilbert spinthariscope. Never let anyway claim such “toys” are not incredibly useful.

    You folks partly have the spinthariscope to credit for the fact that today’s RAM chips are as reliable as they are.

    –Tim May

  6. Comment by dorseyland, August 5, 2006 @ 9:29 am

    That’s incredible, Tim — I had no idea. I hope your story has had better exposure (beyond your paper) than I can afford it here. I have more respect for the little tube than ever now. Thanks.

  7. Comment by nick, September 5, 2007 @ 6:42 am

    if you designed your ECC better it would not have matterd how many stuck/flipped bits

    typical exploitation of masses for you to do your job

  8. Comment by dorseyland, September 5, 2007 @ 6:59 am

    With all due respect, what the hell is an ECC?

    Or are you selling something, in which case, don’t answer.

  9. Comment by Andrew D., December 13, 2007 @ 3:17 am

    A true story — at least according to Wikipedia — interesting how a little wisdom can supplant lots of hard work ;-) see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_C._May

  10. Comment by dorseyland, December 13, 2007 @ 5:01 pm

    Good link, Andrew, thanks for that. I refer to the one that got through - unfortunately my Spaminator bot crushes multiple links in comments, so that was the only one that made it.

Leave a comment




Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.

Hey, Google Earth! Click on the earth and use your mouse wheel or Windows with the + or - keys to zoom, and the Control-arrow keys to tilt.